IHS Inc., Home - http://www.ihs.com

ASTM E 1207 Standard Practice for The Sensory Evaluation of Axillary Deodorancy


Purchase Information
Use this form to request purchase information on ASTM online subscriptions.
ASTM Collections
First Name:

Last Name:

Email address:

Document ASTM E 1207 is offered by IHS as part of an online subscription. This subscription contains many documents on the same topic.

You may also purchase this document alone from the IHS Standards Store.


ASTM E 1207 Document Information:

Title
Standard Practice for The Sensory Evaluation of Axillary Deodorancy

ASTM International

Publication Date:
Nov 10, 2002

Scope:

This practice provides procedures which may be used in the design and analysis of studies to quantitatively assess the intensity of human axillary odor for the purpose of substantiating deodorant efficacy of personal care products.

This practice includes protocols for the selection and training of judges, selection of subjects, experimental design, and statistical analysis. This practice is limited to assessment of axillary odor by trained judges. Self-evaluation protocols are valid for selected sensory tasks but may be less sensitive.

With respect to the source of axillary odor, three groups of secretory glands are present in the axillae which participate to a greater or lesser extent in its production - eccrine, apocrine, and sebaceous. Axillary odor has been primarily ascribed to the apocrine gland secretion (1).(Footnote 2) Body odor intensity has been correlated with the volume of the secretory portion of the apocrine gland (2) and the density of the glands.

Apocrine glands are found primarily in the axillary vault in conjunction with axillary hairs (3). Pure apocrine sweat is sterile and odorless and axillary odor results from degradation of apocrine sweat by resident skin bacteria (4). High bacterial populations are found in moist regions of the body, especially in the axillae, providing the appropriate environment for growth (5).

Eccrine glands keep the axillae moist through thermally and emotionally induced secretions (6).

The sebaceous glands excrete higher molecular weight lipid materials which absorb and retain the volatile materials resulting from bacterial action (7). The aerobic diphtheroids are able to produce the typical acrid axillary odor and the micrococcaceae produce an isovaleric acid-like odor when incubated with apocrine sweat (8). Therefore, the most undesirable component of axillary odor is caused by degradation of apocrine sweat by particular bacteria normally found in the axillary vault.

Personal care products are sold and used primarily for their ability to reduce the perception of body odor not only by the individual using the product but also by individuals within the scope of contact. Deodorant protection may be achieved by these products through various modes of action. Antiperspirants achieve their primary efficacy by means of the action of inorganic salts on the eccrine gland production of sweat. Antimicrobial agents achieve deodorancy by inhibiting the growth and activity of the microflora in the axillary vault thus reducing the microbial decomposition of sweat and the consequent production of body odor. Absorbents function either by "binding" available moisture or malodorous substances. Fragrances are effective by altering the perception of malodor and increasing the degree of "pleasantness." Other modes of control become important from time to time, representing changes in the state-of-the-art in product development.

The studies discussed herein are interpreted through the use of statistical tests of hypotheses. These hypotheses are usually of the form:

The Deodorant Efficacy of Treatment A = The Deodorant Efficacy of Treatment B

It should be noted that failure to reject this hypothesis at a specified level of significance does not prove the hypothesis, but merely that the weight of evidence provided by the experiment is not sufficient to reject the hypothesis. This could occur because either: a) The hypothesis is close to truth and great experimental power would be required to reject it, or b) The experiment by design was low in power and, therefore, incapable of rejecting the hypothesis; even when it is far from true. This can occur due to design structure or low sample size. These facts must be taken into consideration when interpreting study results.

Footnote 2 - The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to the list of references at the end of this standard.

About IHS
IHS (NYSE: IHS) is a leading global provider of critical technical information, decision-support tools and related services in a number of industries including aerospace and defense, automotive, construction, electronics, and energy. IHS serves customers ranging from large governments and multinational corporations to smaller companies and technical professionals in more than 100 countries. IHS been in business for more than 45 years and employ more than 2,300 people around the world.

 

Legal Statement | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Standards Store

Redirector